The Spanish government has announced a sweeping package of housing measures, expected to be approved by royal decree in July. If you own property here, rent it out, rent long-term or medium-term, or are simply thinking about buying in Spain, this is worth understanding properly rather than reacting to headlines. Having watched several rounds of this from the ground, our view is straightforward: this is a political package dressed up as a housing fix, and buyers and landlords should treat it accordingly. Here is what has actually been announced, how it is likely to be approved, and what it does and does not mean for you right now.
Table of contents
- How Is This Being Approved, and Why Does It Matter?
- Will Short-Term Rentals Really Face 21% VAT?
- Extending and Freezing Long-Term Rental Contracts
- Medium-Term Rentals Are Next
- Does Any of This Solve the Housing Crisis?
- What to Actually Do Right Now
- Frequently Asked Questions
How Is This Being Approved, and Why Does It Matter?
Spanish law can be passed in two ways: through Congress, where it needs a majority of lawmakers, or by royal decree, approved directly by the Council of Ministers. Pedro Sánchez’s government has leaned on the second route repeatedly, largely because it does not command a reliable majority in Congress to pass legislation the ordinary way.
That distinction matters here. A royal decree takes effect immediately once signed, but Congress then has a short legal window, typically 30 to 45 days, to validate or strike it down. This is not a hypothetical risk. The government tried something similar last year, freezing rental increases on long-term contracts by decree, and Congress later overturned it, something we watched unfold in real time with clients affected by it. There is a real chance the same pattern repeats with this package: a decree signed in July, changes that apply from that date, and a vote weeks later that could unwind some or all of it.
It is also worth being blunt about the political backdrop, because it explains the timing better than any housing statistic does. This announcement lands while Sánchez is under significant pressure over corruption cases connected to people close to him, and just days after Congress passed a non-binding vote of no confidence in his leadership. In our view, that is not a coincidence. A large, ambitious housing package gives his government a headline to hide behind, something proactive to point to ahead of elections expected in 2027, regardless of how much of it survives the legal process intact. We have seen this pattern before, and it rarely ends with durable policy.
Will Short-Term Rentals Really Face 21% VAT?
The headline measure is a proposed 21% VAT on tourism and short-term rental income, including platforms like Airbnb. Today, an individual owner renting a property short-term does not charge VAT on top of the nightly rate. Under this proposal, that would change.
In practice, this is unlikely to work as a simple surcharge added on top of existing prices. Short-term rental rates are set by what the market will bear. An owner charging 300 euros a night in a competitive area cannot suddenly charge 360 euros just because VAT has been introduced; guests will book somewhere else. What actually happens is that the 300 euros becomes the VAT-inclusive price, meaning the owner nets roughly 240 euros before the tax authority takes its share. For anyone who has built a rental business around a specific yield, that is a material hit to the underlying numbers, not a cosmetic change.
A lot remains unclear. Whether this applies to individual owners as well as companies, when exactly it would take effect, and how it would be enforced across platforms are all open questions the decree has not answered yet. But we will say it plainly: taxing short-term rentals at 21% is, in our opinion, a mistake dressed up as a solution. Short-term rentals are a genuinely small share of Spain’s housing stock. The country builds under 100,000 new homes a year against a shortfall in the hundreds of thousands, driven by population growth from roughly 47 to 50 million in recent years, figures we track as part of our own market analysis. That is the actual source of the pressure on prices. Punishing short-term rental owners does not build a single additional home, it simply squeezes a segment of the market that was never the cause of the shortage in the first place. If the goal is genuinely to protect long-term supply, decreasing the tax burden on landlords who commit to long-term lets would do far more, and that lever already exists, it is just underused.
Extending and Freezing Long-Term Rental Contracts
The second major pillar concerns long-term rental contracts. Under current Spanish law, a long-term contract renews year by year up to a maximum of five years, after which the owner can choose not to renew. In cities like Madrid, Barcelona and Valencia, tens of thousands of these five-year contracts are reaching their end around now, many of them still priced at rates agreed five years ago, well below where the market sits today.
The proposal under discussion would effectively extend or freeze these contracts rather than allow them to reset to current market rates when they expire. For landlords, that is a heavy-handed intervention, and we do not say that lightly. Rental pricing in Spain already sits within a regulated framework, using an official inflation-linked index to govern annual increases. This goes further still, overriding an owner’s ability to reprice a property even after a contract term has genuinely run its course, which is a different thing entirely from regulating annual increases within an existing contract. Our honest take is that this crosses from tenant protection into a genuine property rights problem, and we would not be surprised to see it challenged and struck down, as similar measures from this government have been before. Whether it survives constitutional scrutiny, or scrutiny under EU law for that matter, is a real and open question.
Medium-Term Rentals Are Next
A third strand targets what Spanish law calls alquileres de temporada, seasonal or medium-term lets typically running three to six months. These currently sit in a regulatory gap: not short-term enough to fall under tourist rental rules, not long enough to count as a standard long-term contract. The government has signalled it wants to regulate this space more closely, though the detail of how has not been published. This affects a real and fairly common segment of the market, including relocations, corporate lets, and owners who rent for part of the year while keeping flexibility for personal use the rest of the time.
Does Any of This Solve the Housing Crisis?
Our honest opinion, having watched this market for years, is no. Taken together, these measures read as a political response to a housing crisis rather than a structural fix for it, and that distinction matters enormously for anyone trying to plan around them. Spain’s core problem is supply and demand: not enough homes being built against a growing population, compounded by a heavy tax burden on new construction that, by our own estimate, can run to 30 or 40% of a property’s cost, and a slow, bureaucratic land release process that discourages developers from building at the pace the market actually needs. Developer margins on new-build projects, from what we see across our own deals, typically run around 25%, which is not the outsized profit many assume, given the risk involved in bringing a project to completion in Spain’s regulatory environment. If the government wanted to genuinely move the needle, that is where the effort would go.
Instead, adding VAT to short-term lets or freezing long-term rental contracts does not add a single new home to the market. If anything, in our view, measures like these tend to push more stress onto an already constrained rental supply, as some owners choose to sell rather than continue renting under tighter terms, which is the opposite of what a housing crisis needs. The honest read, from where we sit, is that this decree is aimed at being seen to act, not at solving the underlying shortage, and treating it as a genuine housing policy rather than a political one is likely to leave people planning around the wrong thing.
What to Actually Do Right Now
If you already own a rental property, are mid-negotiation on a purchase, or are simply watching the market from the coast, the sensible approach is to wait and see rather than react to the headlines. This is a proposal that still has to survive both a Council of Ministers signature and a Congress validation vote, and history suggests a real chance it does not make it through fully intact. There is also the open question of whether additional measures, including any change to taxation for foreign buyers, get added before the decree is finalised. That has been floated before and has not gone away.
What we would say to clients right now, plainly: do not let a decree that may not survive Congress dictate a decision about a property you actually want. Keep buying and selling decisions grounded in the fundamentals of the property and the area rather than in decree headlines. In our experience, the prime coastal market in Marbella, Estepona and along the Costa del Sol has weathered plenty of regulatory noise over the years without it changing the underlying appeal of owning here, and we do not expect this round to be different. We are watching this closely and will update this piece as the decree takes shape.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the July housing decree law yet?
No. As of writing, it is a proposal heading to the Council of Ministers, not an approved law. Once signed by royal decree, it takes effect immediately, but Congress then gets 30 to 45 days to validate or strike it down. Until that vote happens, treat every measure here as provisional rather than settled.
Does the 21% VAT apply to individual property owners renting short-term?
That is still unclear. The decree does not yet spell out whether individual owners are treated the same as companies for VAT purposes, or when enforcement across platforms like Airbnb would start. Until the detail is published, assume it could apply to you and plan your numbers around that possibility rather than hope otherwise.
Can my existing long-term rental contract still be repriced?
Under current law, yes, once a five-year contract genuinely ends. The new proposal would change that by extending or freezing contracts rather than letting them reset to market rates on expiry. If it survives Congress, expect repricing at contract end to become far harder than it is today.
What happens if Congress rejects the decree?
The measures fall away, at least in their current form. This happened last year when the government froze long-term rental increases by decree and Congress later overturned it. Given that history, a rejection or partial rollback of this package in the coming weeks is a real possibility, not a remote one.
Should I delay a property purchase or sale because of this decree?
We would not, and we are saying that plainly to our own clients. The package still has to survive a validation vote it may not pass intact. Base a buying or selling decision on the property and the area, not on headlines about a decree that could look very different, or disappear, within weeks.
For anything touching the legal detail of this decree, we work closely with Javier Pérez de Vargas, whose firm in Estepona and Marbella is our trusted legal adviser on rental law and property matters. If you want to talk through how any of this might affect a specific purchase, rental or investment plan, we are happy to give you our honest read on it, and point you to Javier’s team for the legal side, just let them know you come from Santina Homes.
English
Spanish
Dutch
French
Polish
Swedish
German